![]() ![]() a lever attached to a float that snaps the weak end if the fluid level is too high. Use a simple mechanical system to break the weak end if the emergency conditions are met. What about emergency release valves? Plug the release channel with the tough end of the drop. It's basically a single-use "transistor" or "valve" for mechanical force.ĭoes the glass explode with enough force to be used as the primary detonator for a high explosive? I'm no explosives engineer, but seems like having an all-mechanical (no chemicals, no electricity) primary detonator could be useful in some situations where the system should be very stable for decades, like car airbags. Surely there is something interesting that can be done with something that has such unusual properties, even if it's a corner case. It would have saved me an awful lot of headache on small hobby projects over the years, so I'm probably just going to go ahead and hack one together.Įither of the fractal designs (classic "teeth at the ends" version versus "flat-faced", for lack of better names) seem like they would require a decent amount of fairly precise machining, so I can understand them costing more, but $2000 for an Ali Express version still seems high. It's basically just a big vice that has two smaller, perpendicular vices for its jaws, and the smaller vices have captive, sliding metal bars between their jaws, right? I'm pretty sure I could make a set of jaws that would suit my purposes out of parts that would cost no more than $25 at the hardware store. A complete Adaptix vice setup is $7000? I'm sure that makes sense for professional machinists or people working with a LOT of force, but surely a hobbyist version could be made for a sale price less than $100, maybe $200 for a heavy-duty version. Regardless, I'm a little shocked that a) I've never seen either of these designs manufactured by low-cost brands like Harbor Freight, and b) the ones that are out there are so expensive. ![]() if someone is working with material other than metal and doesn't want to damage it? The Adaptix vice seems like a nice approach for a lot of use cases, but unless I'm mistaken, the fractal vice seems like it will get a better grip to prevent curved objects from turning with less pressure applied from the vice, right? i.e. Other alternatives would include 3D-printed soft jaws, soft jaws molded with a low-Tg polymer like polycaprolactone, or an adhesive workholding system like Blue Photon. The practical alternative for milling would be something like an Adaptix vise, which uses multiple sliding and locking fingers to allow the clamping faces to adapt to a non-parallel part. Each segment might only be slightly out of square when under clamping force, but that adds up to a large parallelism error at the clamping faces. A lot of engineering effort goes into minimising and mitigating jaw lift.Ī fractal vise will always be more susceptible to jaw lift, because the play between those recursive segments will add together. This causes problems with repeatability and reduces maximum clamping force, because the clamping force is pushing the part up and out of the vise. ![]() There will always be some amount of play between the moveable jaws and the base of the vise, there will always be some amount of deflection, so applying clamping forces tends to force the vise jaws apart in a v-angle rather than the jaws remaining strictly parallel. The biggest problem we encounter with vises is the phenomenon of jaw lift. a high-quality welder, a mill, or a lathe.Īnother homebrew design I found on a quick web search. Most hobbyist can afford 0-2 tools in the O($3000) range, and while useful, this doesn't compete with having e.g. However, instead of the complex metal machining to keep this thing fitting together, it would use cheap plastic pieces. The design in my head would have the metal pieces take 100% of the force when this is being used as a vise. A classical vise (this could even be an insert) Plastic (3d printed or, in quantity, injection molded) fixtures to keep it together.ģ. These could be economically made on a waterjet, or more economically, by slicing an extruded pipe into disks, drilling those disks with holes for more disks, and cutting them in half, as well as a top and bottom plate.Ģ. Simple metal disks, with holes drilled, cut in half. There's a 3d-printed version which wouldn't be strong enough, but looking at this, what I think would be needed would be:ġ. I think the real innovation would be to bring this from O($3000) to O($100). I'd absolutely love to have one, but for hobbyist use, it would need to be O($100). As a hobbyist, at $3000, I can say this would not pay for itself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |